Is small Small? Is big Big?

Most of compony executives always plan and want to pursue, of course they could, something "BIG". "BIG" can make them survive. "BIG" can make a great fortune for them. "BIG" can represent thier achievement. "BIG" gives them in control of whatever their desire. But the point is what's your definition about being "BIG"???

Some thought they were big, on the contrary, they don't. Some want to be big, unfortunately, they couldn't. Some be able to be big, humbly, they still remain small. I'm surely, extremely, that all of the above were fighting for surviving in this economy crisis era. Taxex, insurances, bills, school tuitions were knocked on their doors. Living under pressure, you would probably make a decision , as they would, to overcome what you have confronted with. How do you know that the decision you had made was the right one?

Recently I have been thinking why the company or organization I used to reconized it as so-called "BIG" company was facing lay off their workers, being punch on the face by their rivals, or even annoucing collapse. What's wrong with their decisions? Or they are too big? Or am I lacking of foresight about judges? Even so, I saw the others which remain small still launching without being effect by worse economy in first two quarters this year. It's easy concept for them. Make everything as small as possible. Big becomes complex, small becomes simply. The truth is being small is more powerful than those being big.

This post was just kinda my point of view.

if you have diverse opinions, feel free to participate in this discussion.

all comments will be appreciated.